Questions of THE Onnon Theory

1. The Grandfather Paradox and Time Waves

In the classic grandfather paradox, killing your grandfather in the past prevents your own existence, creating a logical contradiction. However, Onnon Theory likens time to waves crashing on a four-dimensional shore. If you kill your grandfather, your original “time wave” has already “crashed,” making your existence irreversible—you merely spawn a new wave (an alternate timeline). If past, present, and future coexist, does our current experience depend solely on our position within a specific wave? What distinguishes these waves? Or could Onnon Theory’s core assumptions be flawed?

But what if you actually managed to travel to the past and discovered that it wasn’t at all as you remembered—what if there was no grandfather to kill in the first place?

Questions of THE Onnon Theory

2. The Binding Nature of Time Waves

According to Onnon Theory, our three-dimensional universe consists of high-entropy waves from a four-dimensional universe. What connects or separates these time waves? Additionally, if we travel near light speed and return to Earth, our peers would age significantly more than us. Does this mean we’ve altered our time wave?

Questions of THE Onnon Theory

3. The Absence of the Future and Time Waves

Onnon Theory posits that past, present, and future exist simultaneously because the four-dimensional universe has ultra-low entropy (e.g., the Roman Empire’s spacetime still exists). Yet if no observers arrive from the future, does this imply we are the “first time wave,” with the future being nonexistent?

“But even if we managed to go back in time, what if we found that the past was very different from what we know and there was no grandfather to kill? The waves washing ashore look similar, but are they exactly the same?”

Questions of THE Onnon Theory

4. The three-dimensional universe consists of the surfaces of four-dimensional objects and the spaces between them—because the surface of a four-dimensional object and the space between two four-dimensional objects are three-dimensional. The space between two objects is a lower-dimensional particle, while what remains on the surface is void.

The two-dimensional universe, on the other hand, is the sum of the surfaces of three-dimensional objects and the spaces between them. However, don’t think of it strictly as a “surface,” because the entropy of a universe two dimensions lower is extremely high, and it should be conceptualized more like electromagnetic waves or gravitational waves.

So, what is the “void” of the three-dimensional universe in the two-dimensional universe? Likely, there is no such place that can be reached in the two-dimensional universe. But if the void in the higher-dimensional universe is not truly empty and is instead based on some form of existence, could we call this “dark matter” for the two-dimensional universe?

Questions of THE Onnon Theory

5. According to Onnon’s Theory, three-dimensional beings cannot experience the four-dimensional universe but are still influenced by it. What we call a “particle” in the three-dimensional universe is actually a region formed by the four-dimensional universe. If there is a connection between subatomic particles, separating these two particles does not actually cause any change in the four-dimensional universe. Instead, we are bending our own three-dimensional universe to create distance between these particles. In this case, the connection between the subatomic particles persists.

If this claim is true, could we then say that:

• Faster-than-light communication becomes possible
• In CERN, instead of colliding particles, are we actually bending our universe to bring them closer together?
• Does this mean we are only making changes within our own universe, while everything remains unchanged in the fourth dimension?

Questions of THE Onnon Theory

6. According to Onnon’s Theory, since we are certain that the three-dimensional universe exists (at least by trusting our senses), a four-dimensional universe must necessarily exist as well. This is because three-dimensional motion alone cannot create a three-dimensional universe. In the four-dimensional universe, the sum of the surfaces of objects and the spaces between them forms the three-dimensional universe.

By this logic, a five-dimensional universe must also necessarily exist, as it is required for the four-dimensional universe to exist. Theoretically, this reasoning seems extendable ad infinitum. But can we define, for instance, a 13-dimensional universe, a 21-dimensional universe, or even a 241,713-dimensional universe—one that could serve as the natural basis for its own existence?

Questions of THE Onnon Theory

7. According to Onnon’s Theory, all existence and motion in the universe can be reduced to the movement of a single particle (which we call “Onnon”). Onnon moves through an infinite-dimensional space (where every point is adjacent to all others), generating other dimensions, their particles, and entire universes through its motion – ultimately creating even a single-dimensional moving particle.

Now, in such a universe, is it possible for any structure to truly “exit” the universe?

Questions of THE Onnon Theory

8. In ancient China, sages believed the universe to be spherical in shape. Because the sphere is the most perfect form, and the universe is perfect, it must therefore be spherical. Now, we know that in such a universe, a two-dimensional object cannot escape the universe – indeed, it cannot even look “outward” beyond the universe. The best a two-dimensional being can do is to swim across the surface of this sphere.

A two-dimensional creature might imagine that one day it could cross a line and exit the universe. A three-dimensional being would easily recognize that no such line could exist. Similarly, a three-dimensional being might think it could one day pass through a plane to leave the universe. But a four-dimensional being understands that a three-dimensional creature can only move along the surface of a hypersphere and cannot even manage to look “outside” the universe. A four-dimensional being is aware that no such plane could exist that would allow escape from the universe.

Therefore, can we say that for all beings living within the universe, there can be no such thing as “outside” the universe? That the exterior of the universe cannot be experienced and is naturally a kind of realm of nothingness?

Questions of THE Onnon Theory

9. Let’s assume we’re observing the universe as three-dimensional beings from a distance. The universe would appear to us as a sphere or, more likely, as a cloud. Now suppose there’s a massive rock formation inside this cloud that exists independently of the universe. According to Onnon’s Theory, is this rock inside the universe or outside it? If you say it’s outside, does that mean the shape of the universe is completely irrelevant?

Questions of THE Onnon Theory

10. Are you familiar with the double-slit experiment? If not, you can learn about it by clicking [this link]. Here’s our question: Imagine a two-dimensional universe composed of radio waves or gravitational waves, etc. Could you design a double-slit experiment in such a universe? And in such an experiment, could you determine whether the experimental setup or the particles themselves are in motion?

If your answer is “It depends on what we take as our reference frame,” then what should we take as our reference frame? Does the solution change depending on our choice of reference?